Water on the Moon
I know my posting for this is kind of late, but I noticed a journalistic phenomenon in my research of the story (one that I’ve shamefully perpetuated in the past). By now, everyone should know there’s water on the moon, but there are (at least) three distinct takes on the matter.
First, I offer Science Daily’s article, which you will find reports only what’s going on. There’s water on the moon, some people were surprised, it’s pretty cool.
Water Present Across The Moon’s Surface, New Research Shows
ScienceDaily (Sep. 24, 2009) — In a discovery that promises to reinvigorate studies of the moon and potentially upend thinking of how it originated, scientists at several research institutions have found evidence of water molecules on the surface of the moon.
In another take, I present a slightly sensationalist view from the Science News site. Reading this opening you’d think there was on ocean on the moon or something.
A damp moon: Water found inside and out
Spacecraft reveal higher than expected abundances of the liquid on the lunar surface and in volcanic rocksScientists’ understanding of the moon could be all wet. Its surface is surprisingly dewy and its interior contains more water than previous analyses of moon rocks have indicated, according to new studies.
It tries to right itself with a caution in the middle of the article so I guess it isn’t so bad.
Then we have Science Magazine’s article where they downplay the discovery by quantifying how much water there is, making sure the reader knows the moon is still as dry as a witch’s tit.
A Whiff of Water Found on the Moon
Yes, the moon is a “wetter” place than the Apollo astronauts ever could have imagined, but don’t break out the beach gear just yet. Although three independent groups today announced the detection of water on the lunar surface, their find is at most a part per 1000 water in the outermost millimeter or two of still very dry lunar rock.
It sounds pretty dismal, but they also do what Science News does, and they offer a glimmer of “potential” pretty quickly.
Thank you, Science Daily, for just reporting what is going on without the unnecessary adjectives.




